Pages

Monday, March 19, 2012

April 2nd & March 21st

April 2, 2012.  Many of you will instantly think, Election Day!  Absolutely correct.  

An extremely important day for the Town of Fairhaven.  We get a new selectman, a new member of the board of health and at least one new school committee member, and potentially change on several other boards.  We get an entirely "new" Town Meeting membership.  We go to the polls and in many ways are voting on the way the town will move forward, or at least how it will be influenced, over the next three years or so.

Yet the day also is significant in other ways.  Falmouth is scheduled to hold its April Annual Town Meeting that evening.  Shortly before the polls close in Fairhaven, the Town of Falmouth is scheduled to commence addressing the warrant articles.  Whether it gets to the several that deal with its turbines that night depends on the course of debate and other business.

Suffice it to say that by the time the Falmouth April Annual Town Meeting concludes, the Town of Fairhaven will have further insight into just what how the town often referenced by opponents to Fairhaven's turbines intends to proceed into the future with its turbine project.

There seems to be some belief out there that Falmouth has already abandoned the two turbines it built.  Simply as a matter of fact, this is not the case.  Presently there is limited operation and further study going on to address the specific issues experienced in Falmouth.  

At its April town meeting there are several articles Falmouth TM members will be addressing related to the turbines.  One of the articles:
ARTICLE 18: To see if the Town will vote to appropriate a sum of money to pay debt service and maintenance and operation costs of the town wind turbines known as Wind I and Wind II and further to pay costs associated with the purchase of electric power to replace the electric power not produced during periods they are shut down, or do or take any other action on the matter. On request of the Town Manager.
Another:
ARTICLE 23: To see if the Town will vote to continue suspended operation of Wind I and continue curtailment of suspended operation of Wind II, except for periods required for further study or ordinary maintenance of either turbine, until the November 2012 Annual Town Meeting at which time concerns for both turbines can be addressed in the context of studies and mitigation options funded by Town Meeting in November 2011 as well as a new turbine currently under development by the Planning Board. Or do or take any other action on this matter. On request of Barry Funfar and others.
And a third
ARTICLE 27: To see if the Town will vote to support the Board of Selectmen’s plan of action to mitigate adverse impacts and optimize the operation of the Town-owned wind turbines to maximize local environmental and economic benefits. Or do or take any other action on the matter. On request of Christina Rawley and others.
To continue with its present course of action, the Town of Falmouth must come up with a sum of money to pay its debt obligations and to offset the loss of income, and costs for buying electricity that would have been produced by the turbines.  It is a reality.  How much?  Don't know at this point, but the information will be out there, certainly right after the appropriation, should that be what the Falmouth Town Meeting decides to do.

Why does what will happen in Falmouth matter?  Should be obvious, shouldn't it? 

What the Falmouth Town Meeting decides to do will have ramifications here in Fairhaven.  If Articles 18 and 23 are passed in Falmouth, opponents of the Fairhaven turbines, will use the same as justification for their position.  Conversely, if those two articles aren't passed, proponents of the Fairhaven turbines will use the votes to bolster the "community" project aspect.

The outcome in Falmouth should have a direct affect on the momentum of both sides here in Fairhaven.

March 21st - This Wednesday is the NFIA candidates' forum/night etc.  It is to be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Middle School.  I think this one is to be broadcast live, however, check on that.  This one can be the make or break for candidates.  It is the last forum that will be on t.v. and airing for an extended period prior to the election.

Presumably it will be time  for some hardball.  I have had a number of people representing the different camps suggest to make questions they would like to see answered; and, in response I advised them they were free to ask them.   I will not nonetheless that the questions, if asked, are significant ones, and involve each of the four selectman candidates.  There were also a few for other races.  The answers will be just as significant if the questions get asked.  

Three things when someone answers a question.  Have they in fact provided an answer?  Too often we hear lots of words and no real answer.  Does it make sense?  Tricky one, this is.  As we are all too well aware in everyday life, what makes sense to me or you, may not make sense to you or me.  Is is practical?  Can what the candidate says be done or accomplished in a realistic manner.  Many things come into play for this one:  what has to actually occur for something to happen; do you need to change a by-law; is it legal; how much will it cost to do something; and on and on.

You deserve real answers to real questions.  That is not to say every single question can be given a concrete answer when asked.  We need to keep that in mind too.  Politics is darn complicated isn't it?

Might be one of the reasons why so many people really have stopped paying attention, or simply rely on the opinions of others.  Lots of information to learn and digest.  Lots of thinking involved.  Lots of decisions to be made.  It shouldn't be easy though, at least the way I see it.  Nothing as important as an election should be.  It may be getting just a bit too complicated though.

Certainly seems to be getting very expensive.

Lots of sign holding on Saturday.  People were at three different intersections for the various candidates.    

The election is two weeks from today.  While things are still relatively quiet, the noise on the street is picking up.  One can pick up a stray comment or two if paying attention while standing in a check-out line.  More people seem to be asking questions about candidates.  More offering opinions too.

Nothing wrong with listening to the opinions of others, using them to help you form a decision.  Heck I do it sometimes.  We all do, I am sure.  What those we know and trust think about a candidate is an indication of whether that person merits a vote.

In the end the absolute priority is we all head to the polls and cast a ballot, hopefully with some thought behind it.  Prove me wrong in my previous prediction people, let's see a great turnout two weeks from today.

4 comments:

  1. The turbine issue for me is not being aware of a clearly presented business case as to how the town benefits (apart from the generation of renewable energy) from the two turbines being installed--in other words, will there be a time at which money saved in energy use by town facilities shows up in future budgeting issues (even if it is renewing a rainy day fund, capital expenditures, does it go to an enterprise fund to be used for specific purposes, yadda-yadda-yadda) I apologize if I am missing something that is already out there however in talking with others, I think this is a critical point that has not been explained well to the residents.

    ReplyDelete
  2. These two references go back quite awhile. I don't know how much the financial benefits to the town have changed since the official contract was signed. If you search "wind turbines" and Fairhaven" together within the Standard Times web page, you will find a lot of info on this project going back many years.

    i.e.

    April 25, 2007 Standard Times article: "CCI would sell excess electricity to the pool of electricity on the regional grid. The company has estimated the towers could save the town at least $50,000 in electricity costs per year. Additional revenue to the town will come from the land lease, taxes and royalties, for a total of at least $150,000 a year."

    May 18, 2007, Standard Times article (just following the initial town meeting approval): "The Little Bay turbines will help power the water treatment plant on Arsene Street. The town stands to save at least $50,000 year in electricity costs and get paid $100,000 a year in royalties and taxes."

    I hope this helps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Matt. However, at the wind turbine forum held at Hastings Middle School in January, the developer's representative mentioned significantly higher revenue savings than $50k.

      I think with the contract now completed, it is time to have a simple write-up of the key terms, "what if?" scenarios (bankruptcy of the developer--what happens then), and business case for doing this project.

      Perhaps the candidates for Selectman we have now might want to have an open talk with citizens on future "metrics" put in place for new projects in terms of impact, cost-savings, ROI, non-financial benefits, etc... so that one could measure new projects against an existing yardstick that defines what is beneficial to the town balanced with costs.

      Delete
  3. So based on the math above....for the placement of TWO mammoth industrial turbines within 1000 ft of homes lowering our fellow residents prop values & quality of sleep and their lives, forever changing our beautiful landscape- the town of Fairhaven will only be realizing a savings of $10 per year per citizen (population 15,000)? Is this for real?

    I am beginning to get the impression that many residents desperately want to feel good about the project but deep down know that Fairhaven (or should I say one area of Fairhaven) is sacrificing too much for too little. Simple energy conservation (turn of the lights & tvs) etc really contributes so much more towards a greener earth and hurts no one.

    I would love to see the numbers of $$$ that the developers will be receiving - has that info been released?

    ReplyDelete

Prior to posting a comment, please review "Comment Rules" page.