Pages

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Well two days off from blogging.  Actually more like a day and a half.   I had a piece done for yesterday, just didn't seem to fit so it didn't get published.  So I am taking a "1/2? day credit.  Anyway

You know it is been a "long"  snow season when you start reading blurbs in the newspaper about plow driver's being hit in the head with a shovel. Snow removal is a pain folks.  If that little furry rodent or whatever it is was right, four more weeks to go. 

If there is one plus to the weather, it is keeping silly season in its normal old time frame.  All though for this up coming election, it seems there isn't too much out there at this point.  Two contested races on tap.  B of H and selectmen.  Tomorrow is the last day for turning in the nomination papers.

Just by the "size" of the contested field, the winter landscape will remain a bit less cluttered this year as far as the signage.  The recent snowfall should push the signs going in the ground back at least a week, or at least until the mounds all melt enough for the signs to actually be seen.

Anyway .. I don't anticipate there will be a whole lot of them.

The official cycle of candidates night will be starting up soon. A new group has been added to the mix to start holding candidates nights. I should say candidate night.  One at a time to address its members and the general public who attend.

Selectmen are meeting Wednesday and Thursday this week.  Thursday is a special 5 o'clock edition meeting with the Big "4".

Town Government Study Committee (TGSC) is also meeting Wednesday and Thursday.

We are by necessity to see a whole lot of things begin to shift into high gear.  If i am doing the math right, just 75 days until the Annual Town Meeting. While it is a pretty light warrant, there will be some notable issues, mainly the 4 proposed articles from the TGSC.  If all 4 articles go forward, it will/could be an interesting meeting.

Appointment of a Town Administrator, "revamp" of the BPW, Capital Planning Committee and an IT strategy plan.  I believe those are the 4. Or close enough at this point since the same are still in the "place holder" format.

Anyway ... the STM within the annual seems to be getting some attention to.

Unless you are an advocate of the "it ain't broke don't fix it" concept, any change in town is going to require a consolidation of some sort of the "day to day" authority in town.  I am not talking about all the wonderful concepts of policy and procedure.  Day to day.

I had a very interesting conversation with someone on regionalization.  I all ready knew this person's position on the Town Administrator (against).  All for regionalism though.  Ticked off all the reasons.  Consolidation of effort, economy of scale (i.e. the more efficient less costly stuff).  Willing to cede local autonomy too.

So I asked.  I had to ask. How is centralizing the workings, authority for that any different than the Town Administrator concept?

The answer was, well it just is.

The fact is very few people actually believe that there is no need for changes.  The problem, as always is when the change affects them, be it their favorite thing, their own board, or their individual department. Change is good, so long as I don;t have to change seems to be the mantra.

Then of course we have to deal with the proposals for change.  We will of course, when we get them.

The biggest change needed in this Town is in the philosophy area.  Too much gets done simply because of the "do it because we can" attitude and too little gets changed because of the "that's how we have always done it" mentality.

I am constantly amazed at how that argument is presented, year in and year out by some.  Even if the reasons why we started doing something one way, no longer exist.  Even if a completely new set of circumstances exist.

You hear it too, I am sure.

Unfortunately out of time.  

Be safe

8 comments:

  1. Some town departments rely on mutual aid when certain conditions arise an d praise the cooperation of the towns involved .These same departments are the first to balk when we talk of regionalization of their services.The biggest reasons seems to be possible lack of control.Examples are 911 services etc.NIMBY seems to be prevalent if any thing new policy or ideas are introduced..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Regionalization won't be the end all cure all to budgetary shortfalls. A certain level of vehicles, workers, buildings, etc. still have to be maintained. Interesting to consider though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A good example is state police .If you combine a few local towns there could be a savings in the departments top echelon,central vehicle maintenance etc. They actually work together now in drug enforcement,cross town chases,mutual aid etc.The schools also have space,high school accepts outside students ,maybe elementary could do the same..

    ReplyDelete
  4. With who would we regionalize schools? Acushnet has a fairly new middle school building, and we seem to have no limit for the number of Acushnet students we welcome into our high school. On the other hand, ORR is becoming a popular school choice for our own middle and high school students, and we have two new elementary schools to share.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We dont have school choice so our middle an high school kids would have to move to attend.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Then how is it that there is at least one family living in this town whose children attend and attended ORR, and at least one 8th grader who is talking about going next year?
    When did the school committee vote not for school choice?
    And we're talking about regionalization. Some towns that regionalize their school district have the high school in one town and the middle schools in the other town, like Dennis-Yarmouth.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If my memory is correct Fairhaven pbs are not listed as a school choice district in the Com.of Ma.secondary education website.If there is anyone going to ORR it must be with special circumstances or the town is paying for their education.Or maybe yet there could be some illegal children in the ORR district.The only thing I know they share is players on the varsity hockey team....

    ReplyDelete
  8. Last thing to be published on school choice unless someone cites a specific reference that shows the following is incorrect (that includes you are right comments):

    1. Fairhaven is not a "choice district" . Out of district students cannot attend as a matter of right, subject to applicable criteria. Acushnet students attend the H.S. per an agreement between the towns.

    2. Any student can apply to attend a "choice" district school. Each year every school district has to declare whether it is or is not a choice district. Whether your district is a choice district or not has no bearing. Neither does your district have a say in the matter. It is up to the "choice" district whether your child attends, within the parameters of the "inter-district school choice program".

    3. The "sending" district has to pay the "receiving" district tuition. You the parent or the legal guardian are solely responsible for transportation. NOTE: Bristol Aggie and Voc Tech are not choice schools for Fairhaven students. Subject to admission qualifications, Fairhaven students have a right to attend those two schools.

    The end. Hopefully.

    ReplyDelete

Prior to posting a comment, please review "Comment Rules" page.