Pages

Monday, September 9, 2013

A.B.B. Day 3, or soon to be Zero hour, or Finally!

Election day is here.  

I can hear the collective sigh of relief from thousands.  I am included in that, believe it or not.  

I imagine after the smoke clears and the rubble is cleared and a few heads clear, even the two candidates will let out a sigh of relief in a few days.  

No excuses today about the weather keeping you from getting to the polls.  No real excuse about not realizing today is an election day.  You would have to be a true hermit to get by on that one.

Gloom, despair and agony will rain down on one side or the other this evening.  The same however will be self-created events.  This applies whether my predictions to this point have been correct or are completely wrong.

I used the statement to follow a number of years ago.  "Tomorrow will still be Tuesday. I still plan to get up in the morning." 

Vince Lombardi is the person most associated with the statement "Winning isn't everything, it is the only thing." It has been noted that later in his life, he regretted ever making the statement.   The regret I think being a true example that true wisdom does have a chance of coming with age.

What does that have to do with today's election?  Everything and nothing.  Whether you get it or not determines which one applies I suppose.  

Despite who wins this election, there will be some thoughts flowing from here that some will be quick to deem sour grapes and others will deem excessive "crowing" or "appeasement".  

I am definitely going to be saying things about PACs.  Doesn't matter who wins.  There is a whole lot that needs to be said about those entities.  I may wait until the required additional reports are filed or it may be done in two parts, but it will be addressed.

The winner gets my congratulations, most definitely; and, whoever becomes the next elected member of the board of health will I am sure get my occasional criticism. 

Believe it or not, I can give you five solid reasons to vote for either candidate. No I am not going to.  In the end all you need is one good reason, and that's one you should have to come up with yourself. 

Lofty principles aside, the motivating reason for too many is the turbines. Disagree all you want, it is the most significant issue in this race.  If it is not your particular most important reason, I would just save that from my perception you are in a very small minority on that.

Two groups have made it that way.  Two groups have framed it in those terms.  Most people are discussing it that way.

It is all about the turbines whether you like it or not. I absolutely agree that it shouldn't be.   As the saying goes, If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we would all have a Merry Christmas:". 

If people are being honest with themselves, come tomorrow the victors should take a long and hard look at the concept of "at what price victory" and the losers should take an even longer look at why they lost. That applies no matter who wins; but, it most likely won't happen.  More the shame in the long run.

If your decision on who you vote for is being solely based on who the particular candidate you feel best suited for the position, congratulations.  You are the ultimate rationale thinker. If you go to the polls casting your ballot on who will best represent your position on one or many matters, congratulations again because for as long as elections have been held, it has pretty much been an accepted reason for voting.

Last few words for today, please just go vote; get your family member, friends, neighbors and anyone you run into to just go out and vote.

Be Safe.

11 comments:

  1. Vince Lombardi also said this about winning: "Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing "

    What has Fairhaven gained since the introduction of the turbines ? Can you name 5 positive things probably not but I'll bet you can quickly name 5 negative things

    The Fairhaven issue over turbines is also an issue in other Massachusetts heavily populated communities.The residents who live around the turbines are the witnesses to the noise. The claim is damage to the environment and health.

    Is this what Green Energy is all about dividing communities against each other over twenty year contracts?

    No matter who wins the election they won't be passing out ice cream and cookies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can't wait for the day to end. Let's all hope for no missteps and a clear winner.
    I know who I'm voting for, but I still congratulate both candidates. While I don't agree with everything either of them said leading up to this day, both held themselves together pretty well.
    I'm not going to let myself be disappointed either way tonight, as I have over past elections. It will be a win for the town just to be done with THIS.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are right, I can't think of 5 positives without taking sub-parts from the positives. It may be I am a dunce here, but I also can't see 5 negatives, without taking sub-parts from those either. It is not that I don't see the negatives, but I don't see 5 different ones. Educate me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Negatives

      1. The size of the turbine should have been smaller 660 kilowatt turbine not a megawatt turbine

      2. Noise ; A major issue with a broad range of frequencies causing complaints

      3. Property values : Decrease in property values

      4. Expected town revenue ; Fell far short of promises at Town Meeting

      5. Fall zone of the turbines in the bike path

      6. Documented bird kills inside the turbine security fence

      7. Turbines sited less than 1000 feet from residential homes.New standard 2000 feet

      8. Deep division between sections of town causing ongoing litigation for the length of the contract.

      9. A wind contract written that decreases the amount the town can make each year.

      10. The wind contractor has to run the turbines for two years to keep the renewable energy money. What happens if due to maintenance issues the contractor walks away after two years ? The town has no recourse!

      Delete
    2. Right from the start points 4, 7, 9 and 10 are inescapably sub-parts of a whole, whether it was a good deal or not. Not saying I agree with everything in those points either.

      If you are stating under point No. 1 that two smaller 660 kilowatts would have been embraced, than I will agree the two big ones are a negative. Just kidding, because I don't think size would have mattered.

      Be that as it may, the size, noise property value arguments and the misapplied New" standard are all wrapped up into the wrong location argument (which includes No. 5 also). Sub-parts of the whole.

      As to the bird kill, well unless you are stating no turbines anywhere, and while I am not in anyway advocating senseless slaughter, pretty much the only way to prevent bird kill is not turbines anywhere. I believe many many opponents of these turbines have publicly stated they aren't against turbines, just where these are.

      I say you have three potential negatives with stated reasons as to why you feel the negatives are negative. The third being number 8 by the way, i.e. wrong location, bad deal and deep division.

      Delete
  4. 1. Division of neighbors & town
    2. loss of property values
    3. Noise & sleep deprivation to neighbors
    4. Clear cutting of forestry near pristine marshland & forever changing the scenic Nasketucket River vista
    5. Strobing flicker for some.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are all related to location. Four reasons why the location is perceived by some as wrong. sub-parts of a whole.

      Delete
  5. There is no doubt that no matter who wins the election the litigation will go on for years. It appears that a commercial product was introduced into residential properties by noise, shadow flicker, ice throw etc. You know the drill.

    The Massachusetts Maritime Academy which has a 660 kilowatt turbine has very few complaints. The towns with the megawatt turbines like Fairhaven have massive complaints state wide. The comparisons are known.

    This is all water under the dam now you would think ? The home owners around the turbines have lost something and that is peace and quiet. It all boils down to are the turbines a nuisance and that's another question for the guys in the black robes at a later date way down the road.

    There is no such thing as reverse Eminent Domain. What I mean is if the town built a new dump it could take homes by Eminent Domain for the general good of the entire town. The problem here is the town & the contractor built the turbines on town property and didn't take any property by Eminent Domain.

    At some point in time down the road the residents around the turbines in Fairhaven and other towns are going to want to be compensated for the loss of peace and quiet at their residential homes. No one has acted to help them regain their residential property rights and the clock is ticking.

    The Fairhaven federal class action oil spill lawsuit over the oil spill in Buzzards Bay went on for almost ten years.

    It wouldn't be to far fetched to say a lawsuit by the neighbors around the turbines could stretch out the life of the wind contract-- Just saying-- Folks

    ReplyDelete
  6. Looks like the voters are out there big time. If the voter turn out comes in higher than 30% what is the take on those percentages ?

    Who ever thought there would be a large response ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't see it hitting thirty percent. I haven't received any numbers in about an hour. At this point I have to stick with my original revised estimate of 23.7 percent. Heavier than normal early turnout and than a more severe midafternoon slowdown.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great turnout. Good for that. I didn't want the difference to be in the tens, just wish it had been a little closer. Now we can move on from there and see where it goes from here.

    ReplyDelete

Prior to posting a comment, please review "Comment Rules" page.